In the bustling heart of New York City at the Barclays Center, the boxing world witnessed a pivotal match that is bound to leave a lasting imprint on the sport. On March 01, 2025, during a bout for the WBA lightweight title, Gervonta Davis faced Lamont Roach Jr., a fight that spiraled into controversy due to a series of questionable decisions and overlooked rules.
A Missed Opportunity for Justice
The fight, already intense with each boxer pushing the limits of their skill and endurance, took an unexpected turn in the ninth round. Gervonta Davis, caught off-guard by an obstructive substance in his eyes—allegedly from his hair product—broke protocol by seeking help from his corner mid-round. This moment should have led to a point deduction, a decision that could have swayed the match in favor of Lamont Roach.
Despite the clear breach of conduct, referee Steve Willis, who also dabbles in stand-up comedy, did not penalize Davis. This oversight highlights a critical flaw in the enforcement of boxing regulations, especially in high-stakes environments. Veteran referee Willis’s decision, or lack thereof, has sparked debates across the boxing community about the consistency and integrity of officiating in the sport.
The Role of the New York State Athletic Commission
Further complicating the scenario was the inaction of the New York State Athletic Commission (NYSAC). As the governing body responsible for ensuring fairness and adherence to rules, the NYSAC had the opportunity to intervene through the use of instant replay technology—a tool designed to aid in the exact kind of judgment calls that plagued the Davis-Roach bout.
Matt Delaglio, the executive director of NYSAC, was present ringside but did not initiate a review that could have rectified the oversight before the fight progressed. This failure not only impacted the bout’s outcome but also set a precarious precedent about the role and effectiveness of replay in boxing.
The Consequences Felt Beyond the Ring
The ramifications of these oversights were not limited to the confines of the ring. Lamont Roach Jr., who entered the fight as a formidable contender, left with a record tarnished by a draw that many believe should have been a clear victory. This outcome not only affects Roach’s career trajectory but also poses significant financial repercussions, potentially costing him millions in future earnings and endorsements.
Roach’s promotional representative, Garry Jonas of ProBox, and his team were visibly frustrated by the outcome. They believe that had the replay been consulted, the decision could have been different, providing Roach with the leverage needed in future negotiations and promotional bouts.
The controversy surrounding the Davis vs. Roach fight serves as a stark reminder of the necessity for transparency and accountability in professional boxing. As the sport continues to evolve, the implementation of technological aids like instant replay should be standardized to preserve the integrity of the competition.
For Roach, the fight against Davis was more than just another match—it was a chance to solidify his standing in the boxing world. Despite the setbacks, Roach remains a key figure in the lightweight division, with skills, determination, and a fanbase eager to support him in his continued quest for boxing excellence.
I am a writer with a passion for technology and gaming. I write about a variety of subjects, including Esports, Games, Shows, and Sports. I create engaging and informative content for Hiptoro.